What is welcome
- Games, builds, guides, devlogs, engine discussion, design, UX, screenshots, and reasonable feedback.
- Clear project descriptions, transparent download links, and honest labeling of what the user is downloading.
- Criticism, even harsh criticism, as long as it does not become harassment, humiliation, or spam.
The idea is simple: the community should help development and project sharing, not turn into a dump full of fights, malware, and stolen content.
What counts as a violation
- Malicious files, phishing pages, deceptive download buttons, cryptominers, stealers, and similar garbage.
- Fraud, impersonation, and false statements made on behalf of the administration or the project.
- Doxxing, threats, blackmail, stalking, mass insults, and targeted harassment.
- Spam, manipulation, flood posting, meaningless repeated posts, and deliberate section pollution.
- Publishing content without rights or without the author’s consent, as well as clear legal violations.
For severe violations — especially security threats, fraud, and illegal content — sanctions may be immediate and firm, without a long ceremony first.
How moderation works
- If a violation is minor and fixable, editing, warning, or hiding a specific item is preferred when possible.
- If the risk is high, content may be removed from publication immediately and the account may be temporarily limited pending review.
- Repeated violations, ban evasion, and creating throwaway alts to continue abusing the rules increase the severity of sanctions.
- Moderators should rely on the publication, attachment, event log, or clear context whenever possible, not tea-leaf divination.
Moderation is not the court of last resort, but it is not a roulette wheel either. Mistakes can happen, so the rules allow review of clearly disputed cases.
Sanctions and review
- Escalation path: warning → content removal → temporary restriction → permanent block.
- The chosen measure depends on severity, repetition, risk to people, risk to the service, and the user’s good faith after a warning.
- If a decision appears mistaken, it may be reviewed manually through the site administrator or a future support channel.
A good policy is one where people can roughly predict the consequences of their actions, instead of living in fear of being nuked for a random sneeze.